简体中文界面。帖子、指南及政策正文保留原文;未对原文作自动翻译。

570 g difference before the FR5 has picked anything up

RobinBennett0773 · 2025年10月24日 07:38 UTC

已关闭
RO
RobinBennett0773
For the 300 x 130 FQE-Xc, the manual's table lists 1.35 kg with foam and 1.92 kg with screw-in cups, both in its UR-flange configuration. That's 570 g between two versions I nearly treated as the same tool. I'm laying out a possible FR5 carton job. Would you let the weight difference steer the choice, or settle the contact arrangement first? https://pimmedia.schmalz.com/MAM_Library/Dokumente/Bedienungsanleitung/PGE/4682cec81141_BAL_PGE-05822_en-EN_001.pdf
Page 19 of Schmalz's September 2024 FQE manual, with tool weights, centre-of-gravity diagrams and the UR-flange qualification
Schmalz FQE operating instructions: weights and centre of gravity

FQE-Xc table includes a UR flange. These are not confirmed weights or compatibility claims for a Fairino-mounted assembly.

Manual extract: Schmalz, revision 05, September 2024, page 19 · · Source record

4 条回复

CA
CarlaAbbott0053

Contact first. A lighter tool which doesn't suit the surface hasn't saved anything. Then I'd look at whether I can make the suitable arrangement smaller.

0
LI
LinAbbott0009

I'd put access for maintenance on the comparison too. Can the person looking after it identify and replace the contact elements without rebuilding the whole experiment?

0
MA
MayaParts

That gives me a better quote request: same sample boxes, actual assembled mass and replacement contact parts priced separately. Otherwise I'd probably compare two totals and miss why they differ.

0
RO
RobinBennett0773

Makes sense. Same job first, grams second.

0

讨论已关闭

此讨论已连续六个月没有活动,现已关闭新回复。 最后活动: .