简体中文界面。帖子、指南及政策正文保留原文；未对原文作自动翻译。
BethBaker0498 · 2025年8月30日 13:18 UTC
Request a dimensioned comparison of the tested and supplied assemblies, then have your integrator assess the changed tool position and the agreed handling task. The seller should also offer the route back to the confirmed adapter, so equivalence isn't your only conversation.
15分Asked for both. Existing reply only compares mounting-hole spacing.
22分That leaves the offset unexplained. Point to the actual dimension you need, with the two drawings identified, rather than letting them answer whether the bolt pattern fits again.
19分Trial drawing A2 and supplied drawing A4 now sent together, with the offset highlighted.
13分Did the sample trial include release into your actual receiving nest, Beth? That stage may matter just as much as the pickup with the changed offset.
9分Yes, pickup and placement into our nest. No equivalent A4 trial supplied.
12分Keep that complete task in the request, since another successful lift would still leave you arguing about the nest and the space needed to withdraw.
-6分And retain the A2 supply option while they assess A4. Comparing the alternatives may be quicker than funding an open-ended development exercise just because the replacement is already in your crate.
9分Has anyone checked the adapter's effect on the service fittings too?
8分此讨论已连续六个月没有活动，现已关闭新回复。 最后活动： .