简体中文界面。帖子、指南及政策正文保留原文;未对原文作自动翻译。

cast housing weighed, extended FR10 tool left out of both offers

OliverBennett0711 · 2026年8月15日 12:05 UTC

回复讨论
OL
OliverBennett0711
I already need complete tool geometry for access reviews, and these two FR10 housing-loader quotes leave it out of the load argument too; what assembly data should accompany the part weight when the fingers, adapter and hose fittings all extend the arrangement?

6 条回复

SA
SarahBrown0937

Ask for the complete loaded assembly's mass, centre of gravity and relevant inertia information, with the intended orientations and motion assessed against the applicable manufacturer guidance rather than a bare-part total.

16
WI
WillAli0226

Give both suppliers the same task description when asking. I would also require them to identify excluded hardware explicitly. Otherwise one will price a complete tool and the other will keep winning with invisible fittings (until your order is placed).

15
TH
TheoCarter1019

The comparison also needs revision control. Geometry and mass data from different iterations can each be accurate while describing no assembly you will actually receive. Ask who consolidates the proposed tool information for the application assessment.

7
OL
OliverBennett0711

Integrator will consolidate it; I've sent the complete item list and proposed task to both suppliers, but neither has returned the load assessment yet

10
SA
SarahBrown0937

Keep the hardware order waiting for that review; agreeing who assembles the information has not established suitability.

15
TH
TheoCarter1019

Has either supplier provided the complete assembly information since your request, or is the comparison still blocked at that stage?

-8

参与讨论

欢迎来到 Application Robot

所有人都可以阅读论坛。登录或注册后即可发起讨论、回复或上传照片。

忘记密码?

注册账号即表示你同意我们的 使用条款 社区准则。请阅读我们的 隐私政策 ,了解我们如何处理你的信息。