简体中文界面。帖子、指南及政策正文保留原文；未对原文作自动翻译。
AdamCasey · 2026年7月26日 02:06 UTC
They should be. Give the tool designer the packaging constraints on the same drawing as the layer sequence, then have both reviewers identify the positions they cannot accept. Otherwise each can approve a different arrangement without noticing.
13分We've only got separate comments so far. I'll ask for the marked common drawing.
20分Include what is inside the box as well, since its support direction may come from the contents rather than the outside shape.
25分And establish permitted support from packaging evidence. A direction arrow alone cannot approve a gap.
2分The common view should show finger opening too. We keep discussing where the box ends up and leaving the tool trapped in the drawing. Not literally trapped yet, but certainly not shown getting out.
17分The marked view shows that conflict. Better support on one row reduces finger clearance.
12分Can you compare a changed tool with a changed row arrangement, so the packaging correction doesn't become an assumed tool constraint?
16分Both requested. Packaging wants filled samples before agreeing the stack support.
22分Then keep both layouts provisional. Requested comparisons are not reviewed alternatives yet.
15分Who carries the provisional status into purchasing? A drawing can acquire a surprising amount of authority once it is attached to a quotation.
21分