AdamCasey · 26 Jul 2026, 02:06 UTC
They should be. Give the tool designer the packaging constraints on the same drawing as the layer sequence, then have both reviewers identify the positions they cannot accept. Otherwise each can approve a different arrangement without noticing.
13 pointsWe've only got separate comments so far. I'll ask for the marked common drawing.
20 pointsInclude what is inside the box as well, since its support direction may come from the contents rather than the outside shape.
25 pointsAnd establish permitted support from packaging evidence. A direction arrow alone cannot approve a gap.
2 pointsThe common view should show finger opening too. We keep discussing where the box ends up and leaving the tool trapped in the drawing. Not literally trapped yet, but certainly not shown getting out.
17 pointsThe marked view shows that conflict. Better support on one row reduces finger clearance.
12 pointsCan you compare a changed tool with a changed row arrangement, so the packaging correction doesn't become an assumed tool constraint?
16 pointsBoth requested. Packaging wants filled samples before agreeing the stack support.
22 pointsThen keep both layouts provisional. Requested comparisons are not reviewed alternatives yet.
15 pointsWho carries the provisional status into purchasing? A drawing can acquire a surprising amount of authority once it is attached to a quotation.
21 pointsBy creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Conditions and community guidelines. Read our Privacy Policy for how your information is handled.