Which FR10 tray-unloading message should I send support?

LuisChan1130 · 2026年1月22日 23:44 UTC

已关闭

主帖中文翻译暂不可用,以下显示英文原文;回复保留原文。 查看英文原文

LU
LuisChan1130
Our sleeve-unloading ticket is 39 days old. My clip hides the pendant; seller wants more information.

21 条回复

SO
SofiaChen1152

Start with the exact message and the job version used in that occurrence. Is either retained elsewhere, rather than relying on another phone view?

13分
LU
LuisChan1130

Job version saved. Operator copied 'tray empty', though sleeves were still visible.

11分
DI
DineshBrooks0821

Were the visible sleeves in the active tray, or another tray waiting nearby? That distinction matters before describing the message as wrong.

5分
BE
BenBench

And did the copied words match the actual screen? A remembered label can be surprisingly persistent.

13分
LU
LuisChan1130

Active tray, Dinesh. Ben, the message is visible in one still: 'tray sequence complete'. I copied it badly.

15分
OW
OwenBrooks0834

That sounds more like a job's progress state than a physical empty-tray check. Ask the author what completes the sequence and which tray identity the state belongs to.

10分
SO
SofiaChen1152

Keep the still with the corrected wording. It explains why the early report was asking a different question.

25分
LU
LuisChan1130

Author says the sequence uses a configured pocket count. It isn't checking whether the tray is physically empty.

9分
DI
DineshBrooks0821

Which tray layout and count were configured for the recorded job? Compare them with the actual supplied tray, not just its product family name.

2分
BE
BenBench

So the gripper has not actually failed in this clip?

5分
LU
LuisChan1130

No grip failure shown, Ben. Dinesh, the job has eight pockets; this tray has ten.

16分
OW
OwenBrooks0834

How was that eight-pocket job selected for a ten-pocket tray? I'd want the selection or changeover mismatch understood before anybody merely changes the count.

8分
SO
SofiaChen1152

Owen's point matters. The matching count belongs with the matching positions and sequence, not a number changed in isolation.

12分
LU
LuisChan1130

Trainer selected a similarly named job from the old tray version. Support is reviewing the complete ten-pocket job with our technician.

1分
DI
DineshBrooks0821

The old job may still be needed for its tray. Make the two choices distinguishable instead of deleting one and hoping the naming problem is gone.

23分
BE
BenBench

Does the tray itself identify which version it is?

12分
LU
LuisChan1130
回复 BenBench

Yes, underside mark. Not visible once loaded. We've asked tooling about a visible identifier linked to that version.

6分
OW
OwenBrooks0834

That fits the handover problem. The operator needs to confirm the actual tray before selecting its job, and that confirmation cannot cover a different tray fitted later.

8分
LU
LuisChan1130

Technician checked the correct job against all ten positions. Supervised unloading completed with no sleeves left in that tray.

12分
LU
LuisChan1130

Thanks, Dinesh, for asking which tray. The identification improvement remains open; I've stopped calling this clip a gripper fault.

24分

讨论已关闭

此讨论已连续六个月没有活动,现已关闭新回复。 最后活动: .