Which FR10 tray-unloading message should I send support?
LuisChan1130 · 22 Jan 2026, 23:44 UTC
21 replies
Start with the exact message and the job version used in that occurrence. Is either retained elsewhere, rather than relying on another phone view?
13pointsJob version saved. Operator copied 'tray empty', though sleeves were still visible.
11pointsWere the visible sleeves in the active tray, or another tray waiting nearby? That distinction matters before describing the message as wrong.
5pointsAnd did the copied words match the actual screen? A remembered label can be surprisingly persistent.
13pointsActive tray, Dinesh. Ben, the message is visible in one still: 'tray sequence complete'. I copied it badly.
15pointsThat sounds more like a job's progress state than a physical empty-tray check. Ask the author what completes the sequence and which tray identity the state belongs to.
10pointsKeep the still with the corrected wording. It explains why the early report was asking a different question.
25pointsAuthor says the sequence uses a configured pocket count. It isn't checking whether the tray is physically empty.
9pointsWhich tray layout and count were configured for the recorded job? Compare them with the actual supplied tray, not just its product family name.
2pointsSo the gripper has not actually failed in this clip?
5pointsNo grip failure shown, Ben. Dinesh, the job has eight pockets; this tray has ten.
16pointsHow was that eight-pocket job selected for a ten-pocket tray? I'd want the selection or changeover mismatch understood before anybody merely changes the count.
8pointsOwen's point matters. The matching count belongs with the matching positions and sequence, not a number changed in isolation.
12pointsTrainer selected a similarly named job from the old tray version. Support is reviewing the complete ten-pocket job with our technician.
1pointsThe old job may still be needed for its tray. Make the two choices distinguishable instead of deleting one and hoping the naming problem is gone.
23pointsDoes the tray itself identify which version it is?
12pointsYes, underside mark. Not visible once loaded. We've asked tooling about a visible identifier linked to that version.
6pointsThat fits the handover problem. The operator needs to confirm the actual tray before selecting its job, and that confirmation cannot cover a different tray fitted later.
8pointsTechnician checked the correct job against all ten positions. Supervised unloading completed with no sleeves left in that tray.
12pointsThanks, Dinesh, for asking which tray. The identification improvement remains open; I've stopped calling this clip a gripper fault.
24pointsDiscussion closed
This discussion is closed to new replies after six months without activity. Last activity: .