I described an FR5 enclosure-transfer session as a simple setup. After posting it, I looked through my own photographs and noticed the tool was fitted in the first one, the tray was already located, and the demonstrator was pointing at a prepared selection screen. I had arrived after the setup. What I actually did was load enclosures, follow the exercise and ask questions when I lost my place. I enjoyed that and said so. Now I want to correct the account without replacing one vague claim with a long list of work I did not see.
I have removed 'simple setup'. The opening now says the station was prepared before I arrived. I still need to untangle my sentence about completing the transfer independently.
Sam, the demonstrator corrected my enclosure orientation before starting and reminded me where completion appeared. Nathan, I repeated the loading, but still asked whether the displayed result meant the exercise was finished.
Yes. The tool needed access to the side face, and turning the enclosure the other way hid that face behind the tray wall. Once shown, I stopped treating the tray arrow as an arbitrary instruction.
Yes. Prepared station, supervised repeats and the two prompts are stated. I removed independent. The account is still positive, just less ambitious about what I did.
They did, and have seen the correction now. They were more interested in the orientation example than in my original enthusiasm. Fair enough. Thank you, Caleb, for encouraging me to keep the actual question.