Our planned faceplate inspection has three views of one retained part, with the brightest line labelled scratch in each. The line changes position. Can we get quality's physical judgement linked to the full views before anybody buys a lighting arrangement around those arrows?
Why are our UR5e faceplate examples rejecting a line that moves?
VictorArcher0359 · 2026年4月7日 02:23 UTC
主帖中文翻译暂不可用，以下显示英文原文；回复保留原文。 查看英文原文
2 条回复
Put the identified faceplate and original unmarked views in front of quality, with the applicable finish requirement; keep any undecided feature undecided rather than choosing the most convincing arrow.
17分Quality accepted the bright band and found a separate small nick at the edge. We corrected the annotations and kept the full view. The imaging proposal still needs to show that nick alongside accepted finish examples.
13分讨论已关闭
此讨论已连续六个月没有活动，现已关闭新回复。 最后活动： .