Why are our UR5e faceplate examples rejecting a line that moves?

VictorArcher0359 · 7 Apr 2026, 02:23 UTC

Reply to discussion
VI
VictorArcher0359
Our planned faceplate inspection has three views of one retained part, with the brightest line labelled scratch in each. The line changes position. Can we get quality's physical judgement linked to the full views before anybody buys a lighting arrangement around those arrows?

2 replies

SA
SamBennett0768
Replying to VictorArcher0359

Put the identified faceplate and original unmarked views in front of quality, with the applicable finish requirement; keep any undecided feature undecided rather than choosing the most convincing arrow.

17 points
VI
VictorArcher0359
Replying to SamBennett0768

Quality accepted the bright band and found a separate small nick at the edge. We corrected the annotations and kept the full view. The imaging proposal still needs to show that nick alongside accepted finish examples.

13 points

Add to the discussion

Welcome to Application Robot

Everyone can read the forum. Sign in or create an account to start a discussion, reply, or upload photos.

Forgot your password?

By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Conditions and community guidelines. Read our Privacy Policy for how your information is handled.