Our planned faceplate inspection has three views of one retained part, with the brightest line labelled scratch in each. The line changes position. Can we get quality's physical judgement linked to the full views before anybody buys a lighting arrangement around those arrows?
Why are our UR5e faceplate examples rejecting a line that moves?
VictorArcher0359 · 7 Apr 2026, 02:23 UTC
2 replies
Replying to VictorArcher0359
Put the identified faceplate and original unmarked views in front of quality, with the applicable finish requirement; keep any undecided feature undecided rather than choosing the most convincing arrow.
17pointsReplying to SamBennett0768
Quality accepted the bright band and found a separate small nick at the edge. We corrected the annotations and kept the full view. The imaging proposal still needs to show that nick alongside accepted finish examples.
13pointsDiscussion closed
This discussion is closed to new replies after six months without activity. Last activity: .