another carton pattern, different reason to consider sheets

NoahBrooks0803 · 2025年10月24日 03:26 UTC

已关闭

主帖中文翻译暂不可用,以下显示英文原文;回复保留原文。 查看英文原文

NO
NoahBrooks0803
Sheets were too much replenishment work on our short-run job. This separate FR10 proposal has longer runs and rotated carton supports over gaps. What would make sheets a fair candidate here, alongside a simpler pattern?

4 条回复

NI
NinaAli0240

Have packaging define the support the sheet must provide and tooling show how it is handled in the complete sequence. Longer runs may change the cost, but they do not establish that an unspecified sheet solves these gaps.

10分
NO
NoahBrooks0803

Packaging has not specified a sheet yet. I'll keep it as an option to assess, not assume any separator from stores will carry the carton ends. Simpler pattern stays in the comparison.

1分
NI
NinaAli0240

Include sheet supply, replenishment and an interrupted stack in that assessment too. Your earlier labour finding is useful here even if the different run length changes the eventual choice.

19分
TO
TobyArcher0405

Did packaging offer a sheet candidate, or is support still undefined?

13分

讨论已关闭

此讨论已连续六个月没有活动,现已关闭新回复。 最后活动: .