the quote names the arm but not the controller work

TomasGripper_9974d8 · 2026年9月18日 07:54 UTC

回复讨论

主帖中文翻译暂不可用,以下显示英文原文;回复保留原文。 查看英文原文

TO
TomasGripper_9974d8
I'm comparing first-cobot quotes and one has a clear arm and gripper line, then a vague line for commissioning. It does not say who sets up the controller, proves the basic I/O works, or leaves the files behind. I know the answer may depend on the job, but what would you insist is named before comparing that price with another quote?

3 条回复

EL
ElenaCarter1036

I would split it into supplied hardware, work they do, and work you do. Under commissioning, ask for the actual deliverables: installed configuration, acceptance checks, training, and the files or records you expect to receive. A blank line is easier to challenge than a friendly promise to get it running.

0分
CH
ChloeCarter1005

Also say which connections are in scope. 'Commissioning' can mean a laptop session, or it can mean someone waits while the panel, network and machine interface are not ready. Those are not the same price risk.

0分
TO
TomasGripper_9974d8

That's useful. I had been treating commissioning as one thing. I'll ask each supplier to fill the same three headings and say what they need from my side. Should make the comparison less of a guessing contest.

0分

参与讨论

欢迎来到 Application Robot

所有人都可以阅读论坛。登录或注册后即可发起讨论、回复或上传照片。

忘记密码?

注册账号即表示你同意我们的 使用条款 和 社区准则。请阅读我们的 隐私政策 ,了解我们如何处理你的信息。