简体中文界面。帖子、指南及政策正文保留原文;未对原文作自动翻译。

UR5e sleeve-stop clip after the receiving tray was already removed

BrunoAllen0278 · 2026年2月16日 22:33 UTC

已关闭
BR
BrunoAllen0278
Our UR5e sleeve-unloading report has a clear video and an unclear explanation. Seller wants the tray state before the stop. We filmed after the receiving tray was removed. What can we still recover?

16 条回复

LU
LucaChan1048

Did anybody save the event history before removing it?

7
BR
BrunoAllen0278

Not manually. Maintainer says the recorder may still have it. Video definitely shows the changed scene, not the original tray position.

9
RU
RuthBlair

Keep the video. Label what changed, rather than throwing away the only view you have.

14
DA
DanielChan1087

Ask the package author which receiving condition the unloading step waits for, then have the maintainer find that condition around the occurrence. Tray removed afterwards is useful context, but it doesn't tell you whether it was seated correctly when the wait began.

19
PR
PriyaBarnes0568

And identify the tray that was there, not today's replacement.

22
CO
Colin_Blair

We used to have wonderful fault clips ending with a hand pointing at the screen, while the useful message had disappeared before filming began; the recorder eventually saved us that performance, but only once someone checked which events it actually retained.

3
MA
Marcus_Blair

Who checked yours, Colin: the installer or your maintainer?

12
DA
DanielCarter1000

Keep the tray reference with the job identity. Our records once retained the attempt while the monitor invented a new run label after reconnect. The information was there, but the names made it easy to attach it to the wrong work.

6
JA
JasperBennett0725

Check the exported interval itself, including its lead-in. A successfully created file is not evidence that the needed events survived in the recorder.

22
BR
BrunoAllen0278

Maintainer recovered the original attempt and identified tray. Trace shows seated confirmation disappearing before the wait. It includes the earlier normal transition too. Author has accepted that interval for investigation.

10
TH
ThomasAbbott0016

Our fixture looked home from the front while a rear contact wasn't made. Worth giving maintenance the intended seating detail, not only the signal name.

2
TH
TheoAli0236

Compare that detail with the actual tray and confirmation hardware from this occurrence, because a lost signal can come from the physical seat or its sensing path and the trace alone doesn't choose between them.

22
RE
ReeceBrooks0819

Give the maintenance work a place in the production plan too. Otherwise everyone agrees to inspect it and the shift still expects another unexplained adjustment to keep the job going.

22
BR
BrunoAllen0278

Inspection found damage to the receiving latch catch. Tray could look nearly home without reaching its intended seat. Fixture designer is specifying the replacement; this job remains held, with cover arranged for the maintainer.

20
LU
LucaChan1048

Has the replacement arrived yet?

15
BR
BrunoAllen0278

No. Identified and requested, not received. We have the captured condition and a physical finding now, but no repair or return result to report.

6

讨论已关闭

此讨论已连续六个月没有活动,现已关闭新回复。 最后活动: .