The grip depth is defined, but adapter and connection geometry are not combined with it. Door is a generic opening on this sketch. Our machine lead still needs to confirm the installed survey.

Then ask the integrator to own that combined view and its missing inputs. A requested survey is not a measured opening, so there is no reason yet to describe the route as clear or blocked.

Include the setter's actual changeover task, Isaac. On a layout review, standing space and room to carry a fixture out turned out to be different questions for us.

Setter removes the fixture through the front and brings a trolley to the opening. Those arrangements are in the survey request. We have not proposed another base position or an altered grip to create room.

That is worth keeping explicit. A clear robot route would not establish that the fixture and trolley can use the same space when needed.

Emma, agreed. And the relevant door position could differ for the setter's task; fully open is not necessarily one measured condition that answers both activities.

Have you identified who returns the complete tool drawing, Isaac? Without an owner, the survey can arrive and still leave you with a very accurately measured hole and an imaginary gripper.

Our tool supplier owns the assembly drawing, Gabriel. Integrator has both responsibilities listed with the machine lead. No drawing or survey result has arrived since the opening, so the choice remains provisional.

Will the empty return be assessed as well as the loaded withdrawal? It can use different finger positions.

Yes. Approach, pickup, loaded withdrawal and empty return are now named separately, with setter access retained. That makes the request clearer; it has not yet supplied the missing access assessment.