I'm preparing our sample verification handover for Universal Robots UR5e in a maintenance review of a commissioned inspection cell, using a sample housing. The notes are mostly pendant screenshots without revision details. They show the main routine but omit subprograms, fixture assumptions and expected ordinary PLC signals.
I need a usable structure while the original integrator is still available.
Fixture assumptions shouldn't live only in someone's head
BenAllen0283 · 2026年5月30日 08:05 UTC
主帖中文翻译暂不可用，以下显示英文原文；回复保留原文。 查看英文原文
2 条回复
回复 BenAllen0283
Start by identifying the installed program revision and its corresponding controlled export. Can you establish that link before describing the routine's dependencies?
18分@HenryBell0612 I've matched our installed revision to an export. Some screenshots belong to an older copy, though. That explains the names that weren't lining up.
18分