I'm preparing our sample verification handover for Universal Robots UR5e in a maintenance review of a commissioned inspection cell, using a sample housing. The notes are mostly pendant screenshots without revision details. They show the main routine but omit subprograms, fixture assumptions and expected ordinary PLC signals.
I need a usable structure while the original integrator is still available.
Start by identifying the installed program revision and its corresponding controlled export. Can you establish that link before describing the routine's dependencies?
@HenryBell0612 I've matched our installed revision to an export. Some screenshots belong to an older copy, though. That explains the names that weren't lining up.