I have kept stand costs provisional on other layout reviews, and this FR5 proposal for 140 aluminium blanks needs the same caution: the sketch omits the gripper and open door, so what is the cheapest useful access check before we compare arms?
FR5 unloading choice depends on the tool missing from our sketch
ChloeCarter1005 · 2026年6月15日 15:15 UTC
主帖中文翻译暂不可用，以下显示英文原文；回复保留原文。 查看英文原文
10 条回复
Who can supply the complete proposed gripper assembly outline?
12分回复 LiamChen1186
The integrator owns the proposal, but purchasing currently has only the gripper brochure and a separate adapter quotation.
13分I'd ask the integrator to join those into the actual assembly with the held blank, because separately quoted pieces don't define the shape that has to leave your machine.
24分I would get the installed door position verified in parallel. The opening size alone does not show where the door and its fittings sit during unloading, and a generic machine outline may omit both.
11分回复 TobyBell0666
Does the proposed check include withdrawal with the blank, not just the gripping pose?
25分回复 LiamChen1186
The current sketch stops at the fixture point; I will ask for loaded withdrawal and the empty return as part of the combined review.
-3分Chloe, keep the brochure and adapter quote linked to that request so a substituted assembly doesn't silently inherit the same price and access assumptions.
19分A measured layout review is a sensible first stage, but it may expose questions that need a fuller model. I wouldn't make the cheapest check carry an approval it cannot support.
1分回复 JaneChan1119
Agreed, Jane; I want it to identify the uncertain clearances, not certify the job from a side view, and neither the assembly drawing nor the door survey is back yet.
16分Will the integrator own that combined review, including the machine supplier's door information?
19分