I have kept stand costs provisional on other layout reviews, and this FR5 proposal for 140 aluminium blanks needs the same caution: the sketch omits the gripper and open door, so what is the cheapest useful access check before we compare arms?
I'd ask the integrator to join those into the actual assembly with the held blank, because separately quoted pieces don't define the shape that has to leave your machine.
I would get the installed door position verified in parallel. The opening size alone does not show where the door and its fittings sit during unloading, and a generic machine outline may omit both.
Chloe, keep the brochure and adapter quote linked to that request so a substituted assembly doesn't silently inherit the same price and access assumptions.
A measured layout review is a sensible first stage, but it may expose questions that need a fuller model. I wouldn't make the cheapest check carry an approval it cannot support.
Agreed, Jane; I want it to identify the uncertain clearances, not certify the job from a side view, and neither the assembly drawing nor the door survey is back yet.