Can't choose a scratch threshold from these cropped cover pictures

MiaBennett0731 · 2025年11月5日 10:39 UTC

已关闭

主帖中文翻译暂不可用,以下显示英文原文;回复保留原文。 查看英文原文

MI
MiaBennett0731
Our FR5 camera folder has acquired three different scratch labels for what looks like one shiny stripe. The worst bit is that the crops remove the cover edge, so I can't even tell which way the part was sitting. I've kept the originals we do have. Do I start by rebuilding the image links or getting the retained covers in front of quality?

6 条回复

BE
BethBrooks0846

Get the covers in front of quality. I once spent ages sorting filenames only to discover two pictures were of the same accepted part. The links still matter, but you need somebody to decide what is actually on the metal.

8分
MI
MiaBennett0731

We have the covers, and quality can look at them. I was trying to make the folder respectable first. Cart before horse, apparently.

22分
FE
FelixBaker0458

Both jobs can happen. Just don't let your reconstructed filename become a confirmed sample identity because it looks tidy. Mark uncertain matches and keep them out of threshold decisions until they're checked.

22分
AM
AmaraBrooks0861

Do any of the originals show the cover seated in the proposed holder? A clean reference picture on a desk will not tell you why the presentation changes at the camera.

20分
MI
MiaBennett0731

Two do. Different stops touching the cover in each, which I'd missed while staring at the stripe. I'll take those full frames to the holder designer as well as the parts to quality.

11分
BE
BethBrooks0846

Useful catch. Let quality keep a real faint reject in the eventual comparison too. It's easy to improve the most irritating glare and then discover you've also made the mark you needed to see disappear.

3分

讨论已关闭

此讨论已连续六个月没有活动,现已关闭新回复。 最后活动: .