简体中文界面。帖子、指南及政策正文保留原文;未对原文作自动翻译。

I cannot compare FR5 loads from the housing mass alone

EllaBaker0468 · 2026年4月5日 22:19 UTC

回复讨论
EL
EllaBaker0468
Both housing-transfer quotes omit fingers, adapter and fittings from their load argument. What should complete the comparison?

7 条回复

TO
TobyChen1188

Ask for the offered assembly identities and combined mass, centre of gravity and relevant inertia information for the intended movement. Have each supplier include the complete carried arrangement, rather than adding a loose-tool total to an unrelated part calculation.

21
EL
EllaBaker0468

One supplier has an assembly list. The other calls the adapter customer supplied without identifying it.

12
HA
HanaBarnes0535

Then the second has not defined the assembly it is claiming suitable. Who chooses and assesses that customer-supplied adapter, and is its cost included anywhere in your comparison?

8
TO
TobyChen1188

Also ask why the finger lengths differ. They may be solving different fixture-access problems, so a lighter total will not necessarily describe an equivalent transfer.

20
EL
EllaBaker0468

Longer fingers clear the receiving wall. Shorter set assumes a revised insert, which inspection has not accepted.

12
HA
HanaBarnes0535

Include that proposed insert and its assessment in the second scope. It may still be useful, but it is not the same job with a smaller gripper.

13
TO
TobyChen1188

Has either supplier shown release and withdrawal at the receiving fixture, Ella? The complete movement views should accompany the complete load information before you choose.

21

参与讨论

欢迎来到 Application Robot

所有人都可以阅读论坛。登录或注册后即可发起讨论、回复或上传照片。

忘记密码?

注册账号即表示你同意我们的 使用条款 社区准则。请阅读我们的 隐私政策 ,了解我们如何处理你的信息。