简体中文界面。帖子、指南及政策正文保留原文；未对原文作自动翻译。
HassanBarnes0530 · 2025年8月19日 12:45 UTC
Packaging, with the actual filled box details. Don't let anyone wave it away with alternating is stronger. They need to look at what supports these particular boxes.
13分They've asked for the layer drawing and a filled sample, so we're holding the pattern rather than trying to fix the gap ourselves
17分Could you put the tool's finger space on that same drawing? We had packaging close a gap that the tool designer had deliberately left, then everyone thought the other person was being difficult.
11分Yes, Jamie, the gap is there for finger withdrawal on ours too; thank you, that explains why sending only the box outlines was a poor start
-2分Then get both people looking at it together. Packaging can't conjure support into a finger gap, and the tool designer can't wish the gap smaller after the fingers are made.
19分They are comparing a different tool approach and a lower-count layer, neither chosen yet; at least both options now include the filled-box support detail
8分Leave the original pattern out of the approved folder while they compare. Otherwise someone will grab the familiar picture and you'll have this conversation twice.
22分此讨论已连续六个月没有活动，现已关闭新回复。 最后活动： .