简体中文界面。帖子、指南及政策正文保留原文；未对原文作自动翻译。
CalebAllen0319 · 2025年6月26日 15:54 UTC
Find the readings before straightening, if any, and tie them to individual brackets. Otherwise you only know what the corrected parts measured, not what the fixture produced.
20分No pre-correction sheet found. There is a clamped alignment check, with different reference faces.
1分Then why is someone comparing those dimensions? We found different datums hiding under the same word 'checked'. Get the old instruction beside the final one before spending another meeting subtracting unrelated numbers.
25分On another bracket review we found the fixture copy belonged to an older gusset. Which part and fixture revisions do your sheets actually identify?
3分Bracket D on both. Fixture sheet says B; the proposed copy says A. I'm asking why.
25分Could stores still have the B fixture drawing? I'd search that before asking someone to reverse-engineer the old photographs. Or rather, ask tooling who holds the controlled copy, not just the nearest folder
10分Tooling found B. It includes a support absent from A. Purpose isn't described in the archived change note.
17分Ask the old setter and welding lead about that support, with the drawing in front of them. I'd avoid transferring it as a requirement until its role is understood.
8分And ask who did the straightening. The new cell doesn't get that labour for free just because it sits outside the fixture drawing. Does the proposed layout leave anywhere for it if it's still needed?
23分Caleb, keep the missing released measurement visible in the trial request. Discovering revision B is useful, but you still haven't found an untouched bracket result to compare.
20分Layout assumed no straightening. That assumption is on hold; current-part trial still needs welding and quality agreement.
18分此讨论已连续六个月没有活动，现已关闭新回复。 最后活动： .