简体中文界面。帖子、指南及政策正文保留原文;未对原文作自动翻译。

Which bracket condition did the old FR5 proposal actually measure?

LucaArcher0352 · 2026年8月19日 17:55 UTC

回复讨论
LU
LucaArcher0352
I am reviewing the steel-gusseted-bracket records before our FR5 fixture inherits them: held alignment, released failure and unexplained correction, but how do I link the fit-up and location notes to the final measurement without inventing the missing stages?

4 条回复

AD
AdaChen1173

Start with one identified assembly and follow its original pages. Check the feature and measuring reference at each stage, as well as whether it was restrained or released. A shared job number may link a batch of work without proving the two results belong to one bracket.

1
LU
LucaArcher0352

The original author clarified the numbering: the two sheets refer to different assemblies within one job, so I have withdrawn the apparent before-and-after comparison rather than use it to explain correction

25
AD
AdaChen1173

Keep both sheets with that clarification. They still describe observations, just not a paired result, and a future linked study should not be presented as though it already happened in these records.

3
HE
HenryBarnes0525

Make that correction visible wherever the old comparison was quoted. Otherwise the tidy summary survives after the evidence beneath it has changed

7

参与讨论

欢迎来到 Application Robot

所有人都可以阅读论坛。登录或注册后即可发起讨论、回复或上传照片。

忘记密码?

注册账号即表示你同意我们的 使用条款 社区准则。请阅读我们的 隐私政策 ,了解我们如何处理你的信息。