简体中文界面。帖子、指南及政策正文保留原文；未对原文作自动翻译。
SofiaAdams0108 · 2026年6月17日 14:00 UTC
Link the exact message, current step, time and identified housing job and fixture to one occurrence, then have maintenance retrieve the matching controller and ordinary PLC evidence; keep what the operator expected separate from what happened.
7分The old clip begins after the message was dismissed. It shows a held housing, not the preceding state. I won't guess the message from another run.
18分Who can retrieve those records when you are not there, Sofia? The next useful stop may happen on a different shift.
9分Maintenance cover can retrieve them. I've asked for one shared occurrence note so the fixture identity doesn't get detached from the saved message and time.
22分Keep the original clip in the ticket with its limitations, rather than replacing it as if the later capture proves what happened before that older film began.
24分Has another event been captured under that arrangement yet?
13分Yes, waiting for receiving fixture confirmation, with matching time and step. The locating area is hidden in the video, so physical seating remains unknown; maintenance has the event records.
23分That establishes a particular sequence wait, not a diagnosis of the gripper or locating hardware; ask the technical owner to interpret the linked evidence and identify the next observation needed.
9分