简体中文界面。帖子、指南及政策正文保留原文;未对原文作自动翻译。

Cannot justify another FR10 point change while the puck grip leans

YasminBell0615 · 2026年6月19日 20:01 UTC

回复讨论
YA
YasminBell0615
Our aluminium puck looks crooked in the FR10 fingers now. Tray looks unchanged. What should maintenance inspect before another pickup nudge?

4 条回复

TH
TheoArcher0410

I would look at the actual seating and grip before choosing a correction. Have maintenance compare the intended finger pair, contact wear, mounting and tray location, with the recent service and point-change history available. Looking unchanged from above isn't a tray-location check.

20
YA
YasminBell0615

One finger was replaced recently. Maintenance found different contact heights; they haven't established which assembly is intended.

12
TH
TheoArcher0410

Get that intended assembly identified before ordering another finger. Keep the measured difference with the service record and point versions. Then the responsible tooling and controls people can review the physical correction and which edits still belong with it.

22
YA
YasminBell0615

Tooling owns the identification now. I've retained the point versions. Tray-location check still outstanding; no new teaching change authorised.

11

参与讨论

欢迎来到 Application Robot

所有人都可以阅读论坛。登录或注册后即可发起讨论、回复或上传照片。

忘记密码?

注册账号即表示你同意我们的 使用条款 社区准则。请阅读我们的 隐私政策 ,了解我们如何处理你的信息。