Our FR5 pallet drawing fits the component cases but puts their supported edges over gaps in the layer below. I want the packed construction and complete finger exit checked together, not two separate approvals.
Turned component cases above the finger channels
AnikaChan1117 · 2026年3月6日 10:29 UTC
主帖中文翻译暂不可用，以下显示英文原文；回复保留原文。 查看英文原文
7 条回复
Put packaging and tooling on the same section through the actual filled cases and lower layer.
13分回复 KaiBrown0889
Joint review rejected the turned layer as drawn. Packaging will assess a straight version with fewer cases; tooling has to show its last placement and withdrawal, not just a finished stack.
11分Include normal short orders and returned partial pallets if you use them. Their intermediate support and tool movements may differ from the full layers. Dispatch needs the actual extra exchanges in its workload comparison too.
15分回复 LucyBell0654
Returned partial pallets are part of our work. Dispatch supplied two ordinary examples, with case identity and existing layer arrangement, for the straight-pattern review.
9分Same packed construction on those returns? Don't let a familiar carton size choose the pattern.
7分回复 KaiBrown0889
One return used the older internal support arrangement, which dispatch identified before the review. We have separated it from the current-construction candidate. That older return still needs its own completion decision.
16分Who owns that completion decision for the old construction? The current pattern may become usable without making those existing pallets disappear from dispatch.
11分讨论已关闭
此讨论已连续六个月没有活动，现已关闭新回复。 最后活动： .