One demo got the nice tray

RobinAbbott0077 · 2024年12月8日 19:32 UTC

已关闭

主帖中文翻译暂不可用,以下显示英文原文;回复保留原文。 查看英文原文

RO
RobinAbbott0077
I'm comparing unloading demos. Our battered tray went to one bidder; the UR5e demo used machined pockets. Fair comparison?

12 条回复

LU
LucaBarnes0526

No, because you don't yet know whether you're seeing a robot difference or a tray difference, and that doesn't mean either bidder did bad work.

7分
RO
RobinAbbott0077

Would sending both our worst tray actually tell us anything useful?

6分
LU
LucaBarnes0526

Yes, if it's representative of trays you intend to keep using; an exceptionally damaged one might answer the wrong question.

17分
DA
DanLoop

Was either demonstration required to handle pocket position variation, or did you leave the tray design to the bidder?

15分
RO
RobinAbbott0077
回复 DanLoop

We said existing trays preferred. That's doing a lot of work, isn't it.

2分
DA
DanLoop

It is ambiguous; request separate prices for retaining your trays and replacing them, with the demonstrated configuration identified in each offer.

2分
LU
LucaBarnes0526

I'd send a normal tray too, because our worst one lived under a bench for years and wasn't evidence of everyday production.

11分
AI
AishaBarnes0605

What did you actually observe on the old tray? Slow placement and failed placement are different results. Did the video show either?

-4分
LU
LucaBarnes0526

And did somebody straighten it between takes? I've been caught counting edited successes before.

22分
AN
AnikaBrown0943

Nobody here has seen a failure yet. We're getting ahead of the video.

19分
LU
LucaBarnes0526

You're right, I made my bad experience sound like something that happened in this demo; I only meant to ask about continuity.

6分
RO
RobinAbbott0077

It showed slower approaches, no failures. I've asked both for the same tray trial and two prices.

19分

讨论已关闭

此讨论已连续六个月没有活动,现已关闭新回复。 最后活动: .