简体中文界面。帖子、指南及政策正文保留原文；未对原文作自动翻译。
RobinAbbott0077 · 2024年12月8日 19:32 UTC
No, because you don't yet know whether you're seeing a robot difference or a tray difference, and that doesn't mean either bidder did bad work.
7分Would sending both our worst tray actually tell us anything useful?
6分Yes, if it's representative of trays you intend to keep using; an exceptionally damaged one might answer the wrong question.
17分Was either demonstration required to handle pocket position variation, or did you leave the tray design to the bidder?
15分We said existing trays preferred. That's doing a lot of work, isn't it.
2分It is ambiguous; request separate prices for retaining your trays and replacing them, with the demonstrated configuration identified in each offer.
2分I'd send a normal tray too, because our worst one lived under a bench for years and wasn't evidence of everyday production.
11分What did you actually observe on the old tray? Slow placement and failed placement are different results. Did the video show either?
-4分And did somebody straighten it between takes? I've been caught counting edited successes before.
22分Nobody here has seen a failure yet. We're getting ahead of the video.
19分You're right, I made my bad experience sound like something that happened in this demo; I only meant to ask about continuity.
6分It showed slower approaches, no failures. I've asked both for the same tray trial and two prices.
19分此讨论已连续六个月没有活动，现已关闭新回复。 最后活动： .