RobinAbbott0077 · 8 Dec 2024, 19:32 UTC
No, because you don't yet know whether you're seeing a robot difference or a tray difference, and that doesn't mean either bidder did bad work.
7 pointsWould sending both our worst tray actually tell us anything useful?
6 pointsYes, if it's representative of trays you intend to keep using; an exceptionally damaged one might answer the wrong question.
17 pointsWas either demonstration required to handle pocket position variation, or did you leave the tray design to the bidder?
15 pointsWe said existing trays preferred. That's doing a lot of work, isn't it.
2 pointsIt is ambiguous; request separate prices for retaining your trays and replacing them, with the demonstrated configuration identified in each offer.
2 pointsI'd send a normal tray too, because our worst one lived under a bench for years and wasn't evidence of everyday production.
11 pointsWhat did you actually observe on the old tray? Slow placement and failed placement are different results. Did the video show either?
-4 pointsAnd did somebody straighten it between takes? I've been caught counting edited successes before.
22 pointsNobody here has seen a failure yet. We're getting ahead of the video.
19 pointsYou're right, I made my bad experience sound like something that happened in this demo; I only meant to ask about continuity.
6 pointsIt showed slower approaches, no failures. I've asked both for the same tray trial and two prices.
19 pointsThis discussion is closed to new replies after six months without activity. Last activity: .