简体中文界面。帖子、指南及政策正文保留原文;未对原文作自动翻译。

Why are faceplate streaks being labelled before quality examines them?

RosaAbbott0031 · 2026年7月2日 07:29 UTC

回复讨论
RO
RosaAbbott0031
Our UR5e faceplate planning folder calls shifting bright streaks scratches. I want the retained pieces and physical decisions linked before we tune anything, with the support check in the imaging notes too. Which reference conditions need agreeing for these faceplates rather than borrowing a conclusion from another shiny part?

1 条回复

HA
HarishBell0663

Has quality defined the appearance requirement and examined the identified regions on these retained pieces? That should give imaging confirmed accepted variation and defects to compare under controlled conditions, rather than asking a familiar-looking streak to bring its own verdict from another job.

10

参与讨论

欢迎来到 Application Robot

所有人都可以阅读论坛。登录或注册后即可发起讨论、回复或上传照片。

忘记密码?

注册账号即表示你同意我们的 使用条款 社区准则。请阅读我们的 隐私政策 ,了解我们如何处理你的信息。