Our UR5e faceplate planning folder calls shifting bright streaks scratches. I want the retained pieces and physical decisions linked before we tune anything, with the support check in the imaging notes too. Which reference conditions need agreeing for these faceplates rather than borrowing a conclusion from another shiny part?
Why are faceplate streaks being labelled before quality examines them?
RosaAbbott0031 · 2 Jul 2026, 07:29 UTC
1 reply
Replying to RosaAbbott0031
Has quality defined the appearance requirement and examined the identified regions on these retained pieces? That should give imaging confirmed accepted variation and defects to compare under controlled conditions, rather than asking a familiar-looking streak to bring its own verdict from another job.
10pointsAdd to the discussion
Welcome to Application Robot
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Conditions and community guidelines. Read our Privacy Policy for how your information is handled.