简体中文界面。帖子、指南及政策正文保留原文；未对原文作自动翻译。
EmmaBrooks0811 · 2025年9月14日 18:32 UTC
Yes. Identify each fixture and link only what you can to a specific occurrence. Keep unmatched photos as background. Then capture the message, active step and time with the installed fixture visible or recorded.
15分One fixture has a number underneath. The other has an older label, partly damaged. I've separated their photos and asked tooling to identify the second.
6分Do the clips show any feature that distinguishes the two?
17分Amara, yes, the newer one has a different rear bracket. I can match two clips to it, but not the earliest clip.
-2分Leave the earliest unmatched. Can the two identified clips be linked to readable messages and log intervals, or do those details still need a new capture?
17分Only one has a matching message and time. It says outgoing pocket not clear. The other identified clip still has no message.
1分That one sounds worth sending on its own, with the others clearly separated.
12分Ask controls what outgoing pocket means in that routine, because the physical station name will help maintenance collect the right view next time.
9分Controls says receiving nest N3. Fixture is confirmed as revision D, and the ordinary clear input was absent during the matched occurrence. Support has that complete set now.
1分Ask where that absent input was observed and what produces it. The sequence's view does not yet tell you whether the device, mapping or physical condition is responsible.
13分At the PLC, Thomas. Maintenance is checking the associated device and target with tooling. Earlier unmatched clips remain separate, thanks for stopping me from folding them all into this diagnosis.
7分Has the other shift been given N3 and the fixture revision too, so their next report uses the same names?
25分此讨论已连续六个月没有活动，现已关闭新回复。 最后活动： .