EmmaBrooks0811 · 14 Sept 2025, 18:32 UTC
Yes. Identify each fixture and link only what you can to a specific occurrence. Keep unmatched photos as background. Then capture the message, active step and time with the installed fixture visible or recorded.
15 pointsOne fixture has a number underneath. The other has an older label, partly damaged. I've separated their photos and asked tooling to identify the second.
6 pointsDo the clips show any feature that distinguishes the two?
17 pointsAmara, yes, the newer one has a different rear bracket. I can match two clips to it, but not the earliest clip.
-2 pointsLeave the earliest unmatched. Can the two identified clips be linked to readable messages and log intervals, or do those details still need a new capture?
17 pointsOnly one has a matching message and time. It says outgoing pocket not clear. The other identified clip still has no message.
1 pointsThat one sounds worth sending on its own, with the others clearly separated.
12 pointsAsk controls what outgoing pocket means in that routine, because the physical station name will help maintenance collect the right view next time.
9 pointsControls says receiving nest N3. Fixture is confirmed as revision D, and the ordinary clear input was absent during the matched occurrence. Support has that complete set now.
1 pointsAsk where that absent input was observed and what produces it. The sequence's view does not yet tell you whether the device, mapping or physical condition is responsible.
13 pointsAt the PLC, Thomas. Maintenance is checking the associated device and target with tooling. Earlier unmatched clips remain separate, thanks for stopping me from folding them all into this diagnosis.
7 pointsHas the other shift been given N3 and the fixture revision too, so their next report uses the same names?
25 pointsThis discussion is closed to new replies after six months without activity. Last activity: .