I put our filled-carton section over the proposed FR5 pallet pattern and the internal support lands right above a gap on every turned row; packaging wants the cartons kept straight, tooling wants the turn for finger clearance, and I'm apparently meant to choose which drawing to believe.
Our neat pallet drawing puts the carton insert over a gap
PriyaChan1090 · 2026年3月24日 03:37 UTC
主帖中文翻译暂不可用，以下显示英文原文；回复保留原文。 查看英文原文
20 条回复
Which part of the carton carries the product down to the base? A continuous insert or separate feet? The outside rectangle hides quite a lot.
13分Two folded rails inside, Sofia, and the packaging drawing marks their direction; the turned row puts a rail across a gap rather than along the supported strip.
14分Why is keeping the same carton count already sacred? Losing a position might be annoying, but so is designing an elaborate tool around a pallet nobody has agreed can carry the goods
19分A wider gap could help the fingers. Might also leave less carton supported.
1分We've had a turned row come back into a drawing for exactly that finger-clearance reason. Who owns your combined drawing, rather than each half?
16分And does the customer require that count per pallet? I wouldn't spend time comparing lower-count options if the receiving arrangement rules them out.
20分Count affects dispatch too. Somebody gets the extra pallet to label and move.
19分Bruno, there's no fixed customer count, just our target; Amara, our integrator owns the combined drawing, but I've only had the top view from them so far.
14分Who deals with the half-finished layer when the order runs out, Priya?
6分I'd want a section through the least supported carton, not whichever one looks best. Mark the rails on it so packaging can point to the actual problem.
8分Owen's gap idea needs packaging's input too. More finger space doesn't automatically help those rails.
17分回复 AdaBrown0912
Yes. That's why I mentioned the lost support.
4分Hana, the packing operator handles order endings, which aren't drawn yet; Grace, thanks, I've asked for the section through the turned row and included the rail positions.
8分Our last changeover sheet had two pallet pictures with no way to tell which applied. If alternatives survive this review, somebody needs to own the selection.
11分For the combined drawing I'd include the fingers while carrying the carton, while releasing it, and on withdrawal. A section of the finished stack can look fine while the tool still has nowhere to go. Packaging can then mark support they actually require against those positions. I wouldn't ask them to invent the gripper solution. Give them something concrete to reject or accept within their part of the job.
18分回复 JoelBailey
Joel, agreed on the extra handling, but the current count isn't free either if every order ending needs somebody to rescue the plan; I'd cost both before calling the smaller pattern wasteful
11分The integrator has sent a straight-row alternative with one fewer position and a different withdrawal route; packaging has marked the rails supported in the drawn finished layer, but hasn't checked the placement sequence yet, so at least we're arguing over the same sheet now.
5分Keep the old count out of the operator sheet while that's being checked. Ours nearly got taught from a superseded picture.
10分Is the one fewer position per layer, Priya, or per complete pallet? Dispatch will want the total difference.
6分And please include the short order on that same sheet, not a separate guess left for packing.
3分讨论已关闭
此讨论已连续六个月没有活动，现已关闭新回复。 最后活动： .