简体中文界面。帖子、指南及政策正文保留原文;未对原文作自动翻译。

spare identities checked, our FR5 spacer grip still isn't square

JonasCarter0981 · 2026年6月21日 03:37 UTC

回复讨论
JO
JonasCarter0981
I learned to check the spare identities on the other pickup job, so I've started there on this FR5 spacer transfer. No identity discrepancy found yet. Tray looks unchanged but the grip is less square and people keep nudging points. What else should maintenance inspect?

16 条回复

LI
LiamAdams0142

Inspect the actual locating and gripping surfaces. Correct identity does not establish condition. I would preserve the current point values and edit history as well; several compensations can hide which physical relationship first moved.

17
HE
HenryBaker0438

Is the spacer visibly tilted while still held, or only after it lands in the tray?

6
GA
GabrielChan1062

Liam, I'd put the tray seating surfaces in that inspection too. Looks unchanged can mean the outside looks unchanged, not that it sits down the same.

21
JO
JonasCarter0981

Henry, tilted while held. Gabriel, yes I've only eyeballed the tray so far. The point edits are saved; I haven't asked anyone to put old values back.

8
SA
SaraArcher0374

Let maintenance have that distinction before the next handover. Otherwise one person may investigate placement while another is asked to correct pickup. Neither will know the part was already tilted.

20
LI
LiamAdams0142

Gabriel, agreed on seating. I was not excluding it. A close view of the grip might narrow the inspection, but I would not call a finger worn from an oblique photograph.

11
HE
HenryBaker0438

Has anyone compared a held spacer with an unhandled one from the same supply?

8
JO
JonasCarter0981

Maintenance found a small chip packed against one gripping surface. They've kept it with the inspection note. Henry, no proper part comparison yet, just two people saying the spacers look fine.

12
GA
GabrielChan1062

That chip is worth dealing with on its own merits. I'd still resist writing root cause found until the grip has been checked after the maintenance work.

6
SA
SaraArcher0374

Please put the unfinished part comparison in the handover too. A positive finding tends to make the other open checks disappear from the next shift's list.

8
JO
JonasCarter0981

Cleaning and inspection done through maintenance. The reviewed check held the spacer square, which is encouraging. Programmer still has the point history to assess and we haven't covered all tray positions.

15
LI
LiamAdams0142

A useful observation, narrower than a complete repair claim. Was anything besides the gripping surface changed for that check? Without that, you cannot attribute the difference to cleaning alone.

22
GA
GabrielChan1062

Liam's question matters for the explanation, but Jonas can still report the square grip plainly. No need to make a decent maintenance observation sound like it didn't happen.

15
LI
LiamAdams0142

Yes. I meant keep the observation and limit the cause claim. I would not remove the successful check from the record.

14
JO
JonasCarter0981

Thanks Gabriel and Liam, that's clearer. Maintenance also reseated the removable finger, so I'm recording both changes. The wider tray check is still outstanding and the production points aren't signed off yet.

16
HE
HenryBaker0438

Did the same-supply spacer comparison ever happen, or is that still waiting with the wider tray check?

8

参与讨论

欢迎来到 Application Robot

所有人都可以阅读论坛。登录或注册后即可发起讨论、回复或上传照片。

忘记密码?

注册账号即表示你同意我们的 使用条款 社区准则。请阅读我们的 隐私政策 ,了解我们如何处理你的信息。