I learned to check the spare identities on the other pickup job, so I've started there on this FR5 spacer transfer. No identity discrepancy found yet. Tray looks unchanged but the grip is less square and people keep nudging points. What else should maintenance inspect?
spare identities checked, our FR5 spacer grip still isn't square
JonasCarter0981 · 2026年6月21日 03:37 UTC
主帖中文翻译暂不可用，以下显示英文原文；回复保留原文。 查看英文原文
16 条回复
Inspect the actual locating and gripping surfaces. Correct identity does not establish condition. I would preserve the current point values and edit history as well; several compensations can hide which physical relationship first moved.
17分Is the spacer visibly tilted while still held, or only after it lands in the tray?
6分Liam, I'd put the tray seating surfaces in that inspection too. Looks unchanged can mean the outside looks unchanged, not that it sits down the same.
21分Henry, tilted while held. Gabriel, yes I've only eyeballed the tray so far. The point edits are saved; I haven't asked anyone to put old values back.
8分Let maintenance have that distinction before the next handover. Otherwise one person may investigate placement while another is asked to correct pickup. Neither will know the part was already tilted.
20分Gabriel, agreed on seating. I was not excluding it. A close view of the grip might narrow the inspection, but I would not call a finger worn from an oblique photograph.
11分Has anyone compared a held spacer with an unhandled one from the same supply?
8分Maintenance found a small chip packed against one gripping surface. They've kept it with the inspection note. Henry, no proper part comparison yet, just two people saying the spacers look fine.
12分That chip is worth dealing with on its own merits. I'd still resist writing root cause found until the grip has been checked after the maintenance work.
6分Please put the unfinished part comparison in the handover too. A positive finding tends to make the other open checks disappear from the next shift's list.
8分Cleaning and inspection done through maintenance. The reviewed check held the spacer square, which is encouraging. Programmer still has the point history to assess and we haven't covered all tray positions.
15分A useful observation, narrower than a complete repair claim. Was anything besides the gripping surface changed for that check? Without that, you cannot attribute the difference to cleaning alone.
22分Liam's question matters for the explanation, but Jonas can still report the square grip plainly. No need to make a decent maintenance observation sound like it didn't happen.
15分Yes. I meant keep the observation and limit the cause claim. I would not remove the successful check from the record.
14分Thanks Gabriel and Liam, that's clearer. Maintenance also reseated the removable finger, so I'm recording both changes. The wider tray check is still outstanding and the production points aren't signed off yet.
16分Did the same-supply spacer comparison ever happen, or is that still waiting with the wider tray check?
8分