Our FR10 connector-unloading clip includes the waiting step now, but the seller is discussing a two-clamp fixture. We have one clamp and a separate presence check. What should make that difference unmistakable?
Which fixture detail should accompany our FR10 connector wait?
EllaBell0642 · 2025年12月11日 18:22 UTC
主帖中文翻译暂不可用，以下显示英文原文；回复保留原文。 查看英文原文
6 条回复
回复 EllaBell0642
Send a clear view naming the actual clamp and presence device, with the fixture identity and active job version. I had a connector clip where the missing context mattered more than another angle on the arm. Ask support to describe the wait for this arrangement.
8分Thank you Farah. Their reply used an older fixture drawing. They have the current one now, with both devices identified in the photograph.
11分回复 EllaBell0642
Have them name the current drawing revision in their answer. A new attachment can sit underneath an old explanation for a surprisingly long time.
9分They confirmed revision F and identified the presence confirmation as the condition behind the captured wait. Our technician is checking the retained sequence for that occurrence.
0分回复 EllaBell0642
Does the retained sequence show the request before that wait as well as the confirmation state? It will matter if support is deciding whether the missing condition was actually expected at that point.
17分Farah's question is worth answering before another site visit is priced. Ella has corrected the fixture misunderstanding; that does not automatically mean the remaining evidence can explain the stop.
17分讨论已关闭
此讨论已连续六个月没有活动，现已关闭新回复。 最后活动： .