I've asked the supplier to include support and single-sheet verification for our coated-panel transfer. Their new report still starts with one loose panel on a bench. That's the awkward part conveniently pre-solved
Which single-panel checks should accompany our FR10 vacuum-tool proposal?
CalebBaker0493 · 2025年10月16日 04:50 UTC
主帖中文翻译暂不可用，以下显示英文原文；回复保留原文。 查看英文原文
8 条回复
Did they test anything from your actual stack?
24分No. The video starts with the separated panel already under the tool. Vacuum reading shown, stack nowhere in sight
7分Send that back with the start condition marked. You ordered an answer about stacked panels
15分Does their proposal name a way to detect an unwanted second panel?
5分Lin, just a statement that panels will be checked. No method or response to a failed check. I've asked them to describe both
8分Include no panel as well as one and two, with the supported transfer and release.
12分And who handles a failed separation? That's work the quote still hasn't explained.
9分Exactly. A good vacuum number won't pick up the rejected stack and sort it out for you
8分讨论已关闭
此讨论已连续六个月没有活动，现已关闭新回复。 最后活动： .