I've asked the supplier to include support and single-sheet verification for our coated-panel transfer. Their new report still starts with one loose panel on a bench. That's the awkward part conveniently pre-solved
Which single-panel checks should accompany our FR10 vacuum-tool proposal?
CalebBaker0493 · 16 Oct 2025, 04:50 UTC
8 replies
Replying to CalebBaker0493
Did they test anything from your actual stack?
24pointsReplying to MayaBarnes0562
No. The video starts with the separated panel already under the tool. Vacuum reading shown, stack nowhere in sight
7pointsReplying to CalebBaker0493
Send that back with the start condition marked. You ordered an answer about stacked panels
15pointsReplying to CalebBaker0493
Does their proposal name a way to detect an unwanted second panel?
5pointsReplying to LinCarter0966
Lin, just a statement that panels will be checked. No method or response to a failed check. I've asked them to describe both
8pointsReplying to CalebBaker0493
Include no panel as well as one and two, with the supported transfer and release.
12pointsReplying to CalebBaker0493
And who handles a failed separation? That's work the quote still hasn't explained.
9pointsReplying to LinCarter0966
Exactly. A good vacuum number won't pick up the rejected stack and sort it out for you
8pointsDiscussion closed
This discussion is closed to new replies after six months without activity. Last activity: .