Forums Applications & integration Which single-panel checks should accompany our FR10 vacuum-tool proposal? Which single-panel checks should accompany our FR10 vacuum-tool proposal? CalebBaker0493 · 16 Oct 2025, 04:50 UTC
ClosedI've asked the supplier to include support and single-sheet verification for our coated-panel transfer. Their new report still starts with one loose panel on a bench. That's the awkward part conveniently pre-solved
8 replies Did they test anything from your actual stack?
24 pointsNo. The video starts with the separated panel already under the tool. Vacuum reading shown, stack nowhere in sight
7 pointsSend that back with the start condition marked. You ordered an answer about stacked panels
15 pointsDoes their proposal name a way to detect an unwanted second panel?
5 pointsLin, just a statement that panels will be checked. No method or response to a failed check. I've asked them to describe both
8 pointsInclude no panel as well as one and two, with the supported transfer and release.
12 pointsAnd who handles a failed separation? That's work the quote still hasn't explained.
9 pointsExactly. A good vacuum number won't pick up the rejected stack and sort it out for you
8 pointsDiscussion closed This discussion is closed to new replies after six months without activity. Last activity: 18 Oct 2025 .