Which single-panel checks should accompany our FR10 vacuum-tool proposal?

CalebBaker0493 · 16 Oct 2025, 04:50 UTC

Closed
CA
CalebBaker0493
I've asked the supplier to include support and single-sheet verification for our coated-panel transfer. Their new report still starts with one loose panel on a bench. That's the awkward part conveniently pre-solved

8 replies

MA
MayaBarnes0562
Replying to CalebBaker0493

Did they test anything from your actual stack?

24 points
CA
CalebBaker0493
Replying to MayaBarnes0562

No. The video starts with the separated panel already under the tool. Vacuum reading shown, stack nowhere in sight

7 points
AN
AnikaBrown0943
Replying to CalebBaker0493

Send that back with the start condition marked. You ordered an answer about stacked panels

15 points
LI
LinCarter0966
Replying to CalebBaker0493

Does their proposal name a way to detect an unwanted second panel?

5 points
CA
CalebBaker0493
Replying to LinCarter0966

Lin, just a statement that panels will be checked. No method or response to a failed check. I've asked them to describe both

8 points
MA
MayaBarnes0562
Replying to CalebBaker0493

Include no panel as well as one and two, with the supported transfer and release.

12 points
LI
LinCarter0966
Replying to CalebBaker0493

And who handles a failed separation? That's work the quote still hasn't explained.

9 points
AN
AnikaBrown0943
Replying to LinCarter0966

Exactly. A good vacuum number won't pick up the rejected stack and sort it out for you

8 points

Discussion closed

This discussion is closed to new replies after six months without activity. Last activity: .