I'm reviewing an FR10 unloading proposal for our teaching workshop. The door latch holds it farther out than the supplier drew, and the loaded gripper is missing entirely. I need the actual access reviewed before recommending it.
Our latched-open door is wider than the drawing
TheoBennett0758 · 2025年3月6日 15:33 UTC
主帖中文翻译暂不可用，以下显示英文原文；回复保留原文。 查看英文原文
7 条回复
Send the measured door envelope and complete tool shape. Their current drawing cannot answer the question.
16分回复 JoBrown0940
Sent both, including the held aluminium blank. They had used an empty wrist to illustrate reach. I've asked for the unloading path instead.
4分Include retreat after a failed release too, within the recovery approach the integrator approves.
13分回复 JoBrown0940
The integrator's revised review shows the loaded tool obstructed on the proposed exit. They are considering another base location. We haven't selected the arm yet.
0分Did the new location preserve the teacher's view and manual machine access?
11分回复 JoBrown0940
Manual access appears better, but the proposed storage rack blocks the teaching position. We have removed that rack from the layout and asked for another combined review.
15分How did that review land? The rack is movable; a badly placed base is rather more commitment.
16分讨论已关闭
此讨论已连续六个月没有活动，现已关闭新回复。 最后活动： .