TheoBennett0758 · 6 Mar 2025, 15:33 UTC
Send the measured door envelope and complete tool shape. Their current drawing cannot answer the question.
16 pointsSent both, including the held aluminium blank. They had used an empty wrist to illustrate reach. I've asked for the unloading path instead.
4 pointsInclude retreat after a failed release too, within the recovery approach the integrator approves.
13 pointsThe integrator's revised review shows the loaded tool obstructed on the proposed exit. They are considering another base location. We haven't selected the arm yet.
0 pointsDid the new location preserve the teacher's view and manual machine access?
11 pointsManual access appears better, but the proposed storage rack blocks the teaching position. We have removed that rack from the layout and asked for another combined review.
15 pointsHow did that review land? The rack is movable; a badly placed base is rather more commitment.
16 pointsThis discussion is closed to new replies after six months without activity. Last activity: .