I'm reviewing an FR10 unloading proposal for our teaching workshop. The door latch holds it farther out than the supplier drew, and the loaded gripper is missing entirely. I need the actual access reviewed before recommending it.
Our latched-open door is wider than the drawing
TheoBennett0758 · 6 Mar 2025, 15:33 UTC
7 replies
Replying to TheoBennett0758
Send the measured door envelope and complete tool shape. Their current drawing cannot answer the question.
16pointsReplying to JoBrown0940
Sent both, including the held aluminium blank. They had used an empty wrist to illustrate reach. I've asked for the unloading path instead.
4pointsReplying to TheoBennett0758
Include retreat after a failed release too, within the recovery approach the integrator approves.
13pointsReplying to JoBrown0940
The integrator's revised review shows the loaded tool obstructed on the proposed exit. They are considering another base location. We haven't selected the arm yet.
0pointsReplying to TheoBennett0758
Did the new location preserve the teacher's view and manual machine access?
11pointsReplying to JoBrown0940
Manual access appears better, but the proposed storage rack blocks the teaching position. We have removed that rack from the layout and asked for another combined review.
15pointsReplying to TheoBennett0758
How did that review land? The rack is movable; a badly placed base is rather more commitment.
16pointsDiscussion closed
This discussion is closed to new replies after six months without activity. Last activity: .