Show both layer outlines with the carton support areas marked, then the opening and withdrawal space for the proposed tool. Have packaging assess that same filled-carton arrangement before anyone treats the neat footprint as an approval.
简体中文界面。帖子、指南及政策正文保留原文;未对原文作自动翻译。
Rotated cartons with their end strips over gaps
JoBarnes0592 · 2025年7月6日 16:10 UTC
16 条回复
Overlay done, two ends cross gaps and one of those gaps is the one the fingers need, so closing it isn't the easy answer I hoped for
13分Could a different order leave an open side for the last placement? Cheap thing to draw before anybody buys narrower fingers.
21分Try the full order, not only a different first case. Another enclosed final position may remain. Include the tool retreat after release as well as the fingers opening.
1分Would a lower-count pattern give enough support and access? I would include it in the comparison even if dispatch prefers the original quantity, with its costs shown rather than dismissed as inefficient.
21分Dispatch says fewer cartons means more pallets and handling, which is true, but they haven't priced that against another tool concept yet
12分That's the comparison I'd want. Less efficient by box count can still be cheaper than the device needed to preserve the box count.
14分What pallet and transport arrangement is packaging assessing? The support discussion needs the intended handling conditions, not just the stack sitting on a bench.
9分Actual pallet type is identified, but the transport restraint wasn't in the review pack; I've asked dispatch to add their intended arrangement before packaging responds
5分Include partial pallets too, if you ship them. The lower-count option might affect how often those occur, and a complete-stack assessment cannot automatically cover every unfinished arrangement.
12分And use current filled cartons for the assessment. The internal packing determines where those end strips are useful; an empty carton with the same printing is not the same sample.
1分Packaging has rejected the original gap pattern for the current packed carton and proposed a lower-count candidate; tool supplier is checking its placement order, including partial pallets
7分Did dispatch price that candidate yet? Or are they still mourning the missing row?
12分They're pricing it, fairly enough; no one has agreed that the extra handling is negligible, and another tool concept is still in the comparison
12分Keep the rejection tied to the original pattern revision. That should prevent it reappearing as an already approved option when the cost sheet circulates.
10分Who will own the final combined arrangement? With packaging, tooling and dispatch contributing changes, somebody needs to make sure the costed candidate is the one all three actually reviewed.
8分讨论已关闭
此讨论已连续六个月没有活动,现已关闭新回复。 最后活动: .