Our installed revision matches a controlled export, but I've identified screenshots from an older program copy. Their different routine names explain the mismatch in our notes.

Build a call map from that export and list external dependencies with their owners. That should give maintenance what it needs to follow the program.

That description could sound operationally sufficient, but routine relationships don't establish a valid recovery procedure for an interrupted job.

@AishaBarnes0605 Fair distinction. I meant understanding the dependencies, not choosing a restart point. Recovery needs its own approved reference from the responsible integrator.

Should I retain the older screenshots as historical context? They help explain the conflicting routine names in our current handover folder.

Retain the images as labelled historical material, with their established revision references, so they explain the discrepancy without appearing to describe the installed program.

I haven't completed a dependable handover. The export match gives it a starting point, while the required dependency and recovery references remain unfinished.

@SofiaBrooks0804 That limit fits the missing information you've described; the revision match alone doesn't make the handover ready.