Both tooling offers justify suitability with the motor housing's mass. Extended fingers, adapter and hose fittings are also coming along. What needs comparing before I buy?
Two FR5 offers omit the mass attached around our housing
LucyAbbott0045 · 2026年6月21日 15:39 UTC
主帖中文翻译暂不可用，以下显示英文原文；回复保留原文。 查看英文原文
9 条回复
Request the complete loaded assembly, not just a heavier total. Its centre of gravity and inertia matter with the proposed grip position, orientations and motion.
22分The quotes list the fittings, but neither defines where they sit. So I cannot even compare the assemblies yet.
13分Correct. Have each supplier identify the arrangement it is offering and assess it against the applicable robot limits. A parts list is useful purchasing information, but it does not establish the installed load geometry.
20分Include the assembly revision in the purchase scope. Maintenance will need to know which fingers and adapter the assessment covers. An alternative spare may fit mechanically without preserving the assessed load or grip arrangement.
12分Jasper, that also makes a later supplier substitution visible. Lucy should not have to guess whether a changed finger length is covered by the old assessment.
18分Both now have our intended nest transfer and housing grip position. I've asked for their complete arrangements and exclusions.
4分That gives them a common task to assess. Have they accepted responsibility for the assessment, or only acknowledged receiving your request?
18分Only receipt acknowledged. Nobody has supplied an assessment or agreed its scope yet. Purchase remains undecided.
21分Keep that responsibility open on the comparison sheet. The hardware price cannot quietly become a complete engineering offer because all the component names are present. Someone must own checking the offered assembly for your task.
17分