简体中文界面。帖子、指南及政策正文保留原文；未对原文作自动翻译。
HarishAllen0315 · 2025年7月3日 16:31 UTC
Have them check the finger mounting and contact faces against the intended tool setup, with it isolated; photograph those witness marks before anything gets disturbed.
15分Photos taken. Maintenance says the marks could be from an earlier finger position, so they're checking the mounting rather than treating the marks alone as movement.
18分Fair enough, old marks can send you chasing history; have you got a setup photo from before the pickup started going off?
19分Only a front view. It shows the contact pad but not the mounting. The pad also looks more worn on one side now.
3分Show them that wear too, though it may be the result of the skewed pickup rather than the first thing that went wrong.
14分Don't grant the tray a free pass. We spent ages staring at fingers once while the removable insert was rocking underneath the part. Check the whole seat before buying a nice new pair of pads.
10分Agreed on checking the seat, but a worn pad still needs assessing even if the tray started it.
9分Does the spacer sit squarely in the tray before pickup? A clear answer there would help separate the checks. No need to make the arm the only suspect.
7分It does not sit squarely in one pocket. Maintenance found damage at that pocket edge and is inspecting the pad separately. No confirmed finger movement. Thanks, Julia; I had focused too narrowly on the marks.
12分Which tray pockets were used when the point edits were made? You may need that history when the repaired tooling is verified.
15分And please identify the pad you need before asking stores for a replacement. I cannot choose between similar pads from a note that only says worn on one side.
15分此讨论已连续六个月没有活动，现已关闭新回复。 最后活动： .