HarishAllen0315 · 3 Jul 2025, 16:31 UTC
Have them check the finger mounting and contact faces against the intended tool setup, with it isolated; photograph those witness marks before anything gets disturbed.
15 pointsPhotos taken. Maintenance says the marks could be from an earlier finger position, so they're checking the mounting rather than treating the marks alone as movement.
18 pointsFair enough, old marks can send you chasing history; have you got a setup photo from before the pickup started going off?
19 pointsOnly a front view. It shows the contact pad but not the mounting. The pad also looks more worn on one side now.
3 pointsShow them that wear too, though it may be the result of the skewed pickup rather than the first thing that went wrong.
14 pointsDon't grant the tray a free pass. We spent ages staring at fingers once while the removable insert was rocking underneath the part. Check the whole seat before buying a nice new pair of pads.
10 pointsAgreed on checking the seat, but a worn pad still needs assessing even if the tray started it.
9 pointsDoes the spacer sit squarely in the tray before pickup? A clear answer there would help separate the checks. No need to make the arm the only suspect.
7 pointsIt does not sit squarely in one pocket. Maintenance found damage at that pocket edge and is inspecting the pad separately. No confirmed finger movement. Thanks, Julia; I had focused too narrowly on the marks.
12 pointsWhich tray pockets were used when the point edits were made? You may need that history when the repaired tooling is verified.
15 pointsAnd please identify the pad you need before asking stores for a replacement. I cannot choose between similar pads from a note that only says worn on one side.
15 pointsThis discussion is closed to new replies after six months without activity. Last activity: .