简体中文界面。帖子、指南及政策正文保留原文；未对原文作自动翻译。
LeahBarnes0582 · 2025年1月4日 11:01 UTC
Lost access on our jig after release. Have they drawn the open jaws at all?
10分Only the closed outline is shown; I had assumed the wider outline on another sheet was the open position, but it belongs to a different tool.
22分Then you can't choose the arm from that sheet.
15分Agreed; I have requested both jaw positions and the actual door hardware, which was useful to have identified before our review.
11分Include the block while it's still held. That's another outline.
10分And the fingers below it. We forgot those once, expensive little drawing omission.
6分Who supplies the fingers here?
7分A foam outline of the proposed tool caught our handle clash before the proper CAD arrived; cheap enough to try with the machine isolated.
10分Our toolmaker supplies the fingers, and their latest drawing adds a heel behind each jaw that the integration drawing does not contain.
20分Send that drawing to whoever owns the layout. Otherwise you're all checking different grippers and agreeing very efficiently.
19分Has anyone checked where the wrist goes after the block is seated?
7分We placed a full-size mock-up through the opening with the machine isolated; the open jaw heel overlaps the handle during a straight withdrawal.
11分Useful failure. Does the proposed tool allow another withdrawal direction?
9分Don't infer the arm can make that alternative turn from a hand-held mock-up; ours needed a wrist orientation the joint layout couldn't provide.
21分The toolmaker is investigating shorter heels, while the integrator checks the complete movement; we have not selected a different arm.
9分Shorter heels could change the grip, so let the toolmaker own that bit too.
24分Yes, they are reviewing gripping as part of that revision; the current proposal remains on hold.
22分Please post the revised clearance when it comes. Interested whether the handle survives the argument.
18分此讨论已连续六个月没有活动，现已关闭新回复。 最后活动： .