The polymer-blank proposal reaches the fixture with a pickup point, while the open door and gripper are absent; I need an identified held assembly in the actual opening before comparing base positions, not a reach answer to an unfinished geometry question.
Which complete FR10 tool belongs beside our open machine door?
JamieBarnes0556 · 2026年3月23日 16:53 UTC
主帖中文翻译暂不可用，以下显示英文原文；回复保留原文。 查看英文原文
16 条回复
Have the toolmaker supply the complete proposed assembly, including the held blank position and open fingers. The machine owner needs to supply the working door arrangement. Those two inputs should meet before a base is selected.
14分And keep the setter's trolley route in there. We just rejected an angled approach that cleared a handle and occupied the trolley space. It solved the robot's problem by handing it to the setter.
21分Machine owner has the door survey and setter's route; toolmaker supplied only a closed outline, so open fingers, connections and grip depth are still requested.
14分Who combines those inputs into the layout?
16分Don't use the early picture for training meanwhile. Ours escaped into a lesson.
14分回复 KieranBriggs
Kieran, familiar problem. Our operator spotted an impossible reach in a handout after the designer had already rejected that version. Jamie, mark the issued sketch provisional in the place people actually open it, not only in the design folder.
8分Toby, I own the combined review with the machine contact; Kieran and Nina, the shared sketch is marked provisional and the trainer knows the missing details.
4分Does the proposed grip position match the toolmaker's quoted assembly, or is that still an illustrative dimension?
21分Reece's question matters. A deeper grip can make the doorway view look better and change both the load assessment and release at the receiver.
24分Toolmaker has now identified the quoted grip and complete assembly; combined view shows the rear connection overlapping the door stop on the loaded approach.
17分Then compare any proposed change through the whole transfer, not only past that stop; a revised grip can leave a new clearance question at the receiving tray.
9分Or decide this tool is the wrong starting point. I'd compare another proper tool option before everyone spends a week moving the base around one awkward fitting.
12分Clara, fair, but another tool needs a price and a maintainer as well as nicer geometry. We have kept a manual route after the tidy alternative lost its saving once changeover was counted.
10分I have asked the toolmaker for an assessed alternative and kept the manual method in the comparison; no base movement or tool modification authorised from this failed view.
12分Will the alternative use the same receiving tray?
21分And has the toolmaker accepted that complete comparison scope, Jamie, rather than only offering to send another outline?
18分讨论已关闭
此讨论已连续六个月没有活动，现已关闭新回复。 最后活动： .