I cannot choose the FR5 panel tool from a seal reading

EllaBaker0468 · 2026年3月28日 00:52 UTC

已关闭

主帖中文翻译暂不可用,以下显示英文原文;回复保留原文。 查看英文原文

EL
EllaBaker0468
The access panel seals on the proposed cups. Stack separation and support through release are still untested.

15 条回复

JA
JackAllen0341

We found a panel was fine on the cups and bowed when it reached the nest. Ask for the whole route with your actual stack and receiving fixture, including how a second sheet is detected. The vacuum reading is only one part of that comparison.

6分
EL
EllaBaker0468

Supplier's report used one panel already separated from the stack. I've asked them to state that.

8分
MI
MinaChan1120

Can you send representative panels as a stack, including the ordinary surface and flatness variation? The sample should resemble what stores will supply, not the one panel everyone chose because it looked easiest.

6分
MA
MayaAli0214

And include the stack preparation in the workload. If someone separates every sheet first, that is a different feed option with its own handling time.

20分
LU
LucaAllen0265

Maya, that might still be worth comparing. We shouldn't make automatic stack separation a requirement if manually separated presentation would leave a useful job.

12分
MA
MayaAli0214

Agreed. I meant price it honestly, not rule it out. Ella's original proposal starts with a stack, so changing the start needs to be visible.

11分
EL
EllaBaker0468

Both feed options are in the comparison. Representative stack sent with the receiving-fixture details.

13分
JA
JackAllen0341

Ask them to check the released panel condition too, not only whether it appears to sit in the nest. A flexible panel can look settled while still being held out of shape.

14分
MI
MinaChan1120

What identifies a double panel in their proposed check?

21分
EL
EllaBaker0468

Supplier proposes a thickness check, but has not demonstrated its single, double or uncertain indications yet.

23分
LU
LucaAllen0265

Have them show those known cases and the response to uncertainty, with the actual panel surfaces. I wouldn't choose the detector from its name alone.

15分
EL
EllaBaker0468

Stack trial produced a double pickup. The proposed check identified the known single and double samples, but one damaged sample gave an uncertain indication.

13分
JA
JackAllen0341

Uncertain may be the correct indication for that sample. What does the proposed process do with it, and was it inside your accepted incoming range?

23分
EL
EllaBaker0468

Outside the agreed incoming range. It held for operator review, as specified. Support at release still leaves a corner lifted on an accepted single panel.

5分
MA
MayaAli0214

Keep that support problem open in both feed options. Manual separation might remove one task, but it will not repair the way an accepted single panel lands in the fixture.

7分

讨论已关闭

此讨论已连续六个月没有活动,现已关闭新回复。 最后活动: .