I overlaid our proposed FR5 pallet layers and found a gap beneath the divider carrying most of the contents. The alternating pattern looks great from above. What should packaging review before tooling is chosen?
the tidy pallet drawing has a hole under the heavy bit
ThomasAbbott0016 · 2025年2月11日 18:52 UTC
主帖中文翻译暂不可用，以下显示英文原文；回复保留原文。 查看英文原文
6 条回复
Give packaging the loaded carton construction and both layer drawings. The external dimensions alone won't tell them how the contents transfer load. And don't assume an interlocked pattern is automatically stronger just because the picture looks convincing.
13分They have the carton drawing now. The divider foot is narrower than I expected, so the overlap problem is worse than my first sketch suggested.
13分Worse geometrically, yes. Actual performance still needs packaging's assessment. Keep the concern precise: the proposed support beneath that divider is interrupted. That's enough to request review without predicting a collapse.
3分Our pattern lost cartons after tool clearance review. Bring tooling into this before approving either layer.
25分Especially the release and exit space near the centre cases. Packaging may favour a tight pattern that the proposed tool can't place cleanly. Both teams need to work from the same revision.
14分What did packaging say about the divider load? I'm facing a similar choice, though ours has two small boxes inside rather than one heavy compartment.
16分讨论已关闭
此讨论已连续六个月没有活动，现已关闭新回复。 最后活动： .