I'm looking through the bezel pictures for our UR5e inspection proposal and the same part changes from good to scratched when somebody reseats it. That's a fairly impressive rate of damage for a still photograph.
Before we start adjusting thresholds, I want quality to examine the real bezels and stop the filenames deciding the answer. What should we keep with each image so the next person can repeat the comparison?
we have taught the folder that shiny means damaged
Marcus_Bailey · 2025年6月26日 06:06 UTC
主帖中文翻译暂不可用，以下显示英文原文；回复保留原文。 查看英文原文
2 条回复
Physical sample ID, its agreed judgement, and the camera, lighting and seating arrangement. Keep disputed labels separate. A consistent filename won't rescue an uncertain physical reference.
19分Quality identified a real nick on one bezel, nowhere near the bright streak we'd called a scratch. We've kept both observations against that sample and started a new comparison with the seating position recorded. Threshold work is still waiting.
3分讨论已关闭
此讨论已连续六个月没有活动，现已关闭新回复。 最后活动： .