I'm looking through the bezel pictures for our UR5e inspection proposal and the same part changes from good to scratched when somebody reseats it. That's a fairly impressive rate of damage for a still photograph.
Before we start adjusting thresholds, I want quality to examine the real bezels and stop the filenames deciding the answer. What should we keep with each image so the next person can repeat the comparison?
we have taught the folder that shiny means damaged
Marcus_Bailey · 26 Jun 2025, 06:06 UTC
2 replies
Replying to Marcus_Bailey
Physical sample ID, its agreed judgement, and the camera, lighting and seating arrangement. Keep disputed labels separate. A consistent filename won't rescue an uncertain physical reference.
19pointsReplying to EllaBarnes0555
Quality identified a real nick on one bezel, nowhere near the bright streak we'd called a scratch. We've kept both observations against that sample and started a new comparison with the seating position recorded. Threshold work is still waiting.
3pointsDiscussion closed
This discussion is closed to new replies after six months without activity. Last activity: .